Makes me wonder if he really believes all this sh*t he's spewing. ???
Makes me wonder if he really believes all this sh*t he's spewing. ???
http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?.../10/23/1527244
his partner in crime is right behind him too
Why are they comparing to RH6 ??? ??? oh thats right cause they know RH9 is much much better ;D
Not to mention the fact that a lot of Open Source bugs discovered come to surface as the result of code audits, not exploits as in the case of M$ software.
while are at it why dont we compare linux today to windows 95 or me ;D
[quote author=cloverm link=board=13;threadid=7996;start=0#msg72963 date=1066927223]
Not to mention the fact that a lot of Open Source bugs discovered come to surface as the result of code audits, not exploits as in the case of M$ software.
[/quote]
And OS bugs get fixed right away for free. M$ bugs takes years to fix (if ever) and then you have to buy the new version of the software.
[quote author=burntash link=board=13;threadid=7996;start=0#msg72975 date=1066937077]
while are at it why dont we compare linux today to windows 95 or me ;D
[/quote]
i belive nt4 server vs linux 2.4.22 would be the best one to do...and then windows ME would be shattered within the first 10th of the comparison
[quote author=mojo jojo link=board=13;threadid=7996;start=0#msg72962 date=1066926179]
Why are they comparing to RH6 ??? ??? oh thats right cause they know RH9 is much much better ;D
[/quote]
Stock Win2K was released right around RH 6.2. So I have to say, between that and the plethora of RH 6.2 servers still out there (patched to hell and back), I cant disagree there. But with current Windows servers, they must then take it against say ... RHEL 3 to be entirely fair. And there is where they lose their asses off. They picked a fight that could more easily be distorted.
Bookmarks