Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19

Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19
Handicapping SCO versus Linux
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Handicapping SCO versus Linux

  1. #1

    Handicapping SCO versus Linux

    The history of the computer industry proves that things eventually do get straightened out, but not before companies are forced to find their way through a prolonged period of uncertainty. That's certainly the case in the current dispute that pits The SCO Group against the Linux community, says Stuart Meyer, an intellectual property partner with Fenwick & West in Mountain View, Calif.

    Read Full Story Here

  2. #2

    Re:Handicapping SCO versus Linux

    More SCO

    "Back in June, there was a protest by Linux users at SCO headquarters, which received some coverage in the press, including here on Groklaw. I now have a transcript of the conversation between SCO CEO Darl McBride and the protesters. I've also listened to the tape to verify the accuracy of the transcript, and you can do the same if you can play .ogg files, here. There are a couple of places where the sound isn't clear, so I've indicated that in the transcript.

    "McBride talks about a number of issues, such as SGI, whether SCO intended to sue end users or commercial only, how and when they discovered the alleged 'infringement,' Caldera's contributions to Linux, and whether Debian is a safe version of GNU/Linux to use because of its noncommercial nature. He also tells them that SCO isn't interested in suing individual users or even small commercial users. Its beef, he says, is with the 'Unix vendor community,' UNIX-licensing companies switching to Linux and donating code to Linux so they don't have to pay any more royalties to SCO for Unix code, 'the vendors that are getting an economic incentive to reducing the amount of royalties that they pay by virtue of taking our property and putting it into Linux, then turn around and saying it's a free system.' He mentions that they were talking about 64-way systems, not home users.

    "He also says they found 'hundreds of thousands of lines of code that are infringing against our contracts.' Note the plural on contracts. He claims the increase in functionality in Linux is because of 'vendors' that SCO has 'confidentiality agreements' with. Again, note the plural..."
    http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?s...31010223050711

Similar Threads

  1. X-server versus SLI
    By hoiladon in forum Linux - Software, Applications & Programming
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-18-2007, 09:11 AM
  2. (i++) Versus (i = i +1)
    By gorn in forum Linux - Software, Applications & Programming
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-05-2005, 04:31 AM
  3. X2 Versus GNOME
    By Ashcrow in forum Linux - Software, Applications & Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-02-2004, 11:32 AM
  4. Win2000 Advanced versus Linux Advanced???
    By Nuray in forum Linux - General Topics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-27-2003, 09:17 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •