SCO Attorney Declares GPL Invalid

**BJ250** · 08-14-2003, 07:14 PM

Pardon my french,

L O FUCKING L

http://slashdot.org/articles/03/08/1...=88&tid=99

08-15-2003, 02:28 AM

SCO declares Linux an illusion - it's not really there, it's all just SCO-Unixware in disguise.

Linus Torvalds is a fag says SCO lawyer (busy week, we didn't have time to make up a decent lie about Linux and it's apparent transgressions against the one true UNIX)

**Ashcrow** · 08-17-2003, 02:08 AM

Well, if GPL is invalid think what will happen to all those licenses that take up more than a few paragraphs ... they must be doubly invalid.

**stryder144** · 08-17-2003, 03:04 AM

That's it! I hereby declare that SCO's attornies are invalid!

;D

**gorn** · 08-17-2003, 06:36 PM

if GPL is invalid then it doesn't force all GPL'ed to public domain, it's still copy written. meaning the GPL'ed code sco distributes on it's server (ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/scolinux/server/4.0/updates/SRPMS)

is in violation of copy right law.

this whole situation has gotten way to riddiculus, and every move of theirs is just to make their stock prices jump again.