Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Debian vs ????????

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    269

    Debian vs ????????

    Please do not misunderstand - I am not trying to start a flamewar - I am just curious. I have been trying Debian (Knoppix) on my second HD to see how good a system it is. I LOVE the apt-get feature but the versions of software offered (Netscape 4.7!!!) are OLD!. I am looking at alternatives for MDK 9.0 - is there a Linux flavor that is easy to install, solid and dependable that has more updated software? Thanks in advance!

  2. #2
    Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    1,672

    Re:Debian vs ????????

    Just set your sources.list to the unstable tree, you'll have all the latest software. Don't let "unstable" scare you, that's what I've been using, updating almost every day.

  3. #3
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    858

    Re:Debian vs ????????

    I also ran knoppix for a while and got away from it for the same reason, apt-get was outdated, and getting apt-get working propperly with unstable and good mirrors was painful. I am now using gentoo, which has it's portage package management system, very up to date packages, easier to use, more reliable mirrors, and easier to configure. The only downside (or upside in my opinion ) is that you have to compile most packages from source, but it does it for you. For example, "emerge kde" will download and compile everything required, you don't have to actually do the ./configure && make && make install etc.

    Just my 2c

  4. #4
    Mentor coltrane's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,390

    Re:Debian vs ????????

    what about Slackware?

  5. #5
    Guest

    Re:Debian vs ????????

    GENTOO !!! GENTOO !!! GENTOO !!! GENTOO !!! GENTOO !!! GENTOO !!! GENTOO !!! GENTOO !!! GENTOO !!! GENTOO !!! GENTOO !!! GENTOO !!!

    *guess which distro I use*

    but seriously, Gentoo is the home of many ex debbies, because the systems are very similar (of course I think Gentoo is better but.)

    I've used both and I love both but Gentoo is just to brilliantly designed.

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Good Guru
    Schotty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    5,760

    Re:Debian vs ????????

    [quote author=coltrane link=board=7;threadid=6641;start=0#62350 date=1048187348]
    what about Slackware?
    [/quote]

    I am still waiting on this one to arrive, but it always just worked really well. I agree, give that a shot.

  7. #7

    Re:Debian vs ????????

    I second (third?) Gentoo. I used to LOVE Debbie and thought nothing could beat apt-get until I was introduced to Gentoo's portage. Like apt-get but with sources instead. Everything is compiled on your own machine so you can optimize for your system. Sources are generally pretty good about compiling (not many errors). My Gentoo 1.4_rc2 system simply screams in comparison to my old RedHat 8.

    The only downside to Gentoo I can think of is also its upside. Gentoo is very highly configurable. You can compile your sources with or without optimizations, and with or without support for various other apps (for example, Gnome's nautilus must be compiled with mozilla support in order to be used as a browser). However, if you don't take the time to learn how these optimizations work, you'll be stuck with the rather mediocre defaults. When configuring portage I had to dig up the GCC documentation and look for optimization flags to compile with...I also had to dig up some Gentoo docs so I could compile things like ogg vorbis and mozilla support into other apps. My old gentoo system quite sucked until I really dug into the portage config files and added what I want and did a total system recompile ("emerge world"...total system recompile...i'n't that neat??)

    So that's my only warning. I'd definitely recommend Gentoo, but you have to take half a day to do some reading and add some optimizations. Oh and don't expect to have a decent system up and running for at least a few days unless you're experienced. The install is not for the faint of heart, and things like KDE have to be compiled from source which will take a day or two.

  8. #8

    Re:Debian vs ????????

    Libranet is a great Debian based distro that is generally up-to-date and easy to install/use.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    419

    Re:Debian vs ????????

    Just run Debian Sid (I do) and you'll be plenty up-to-date.

  10. #10
    Associate
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    25

    Re:Debian vs ????????

    [quote author=Tyr_7BE link=board=7;threadid=6641;start=0#62651 date=1048549455]
    Like apt-get but with sources instead.
    [/quote]

    edit your sources.list so there are no # sign in front of the source sources, and your argument disappears.

    I've been running a mostly source based debian distro for a year or so now...

Similar Threads

  1. Debian
    By BurntAsh in forum Linux - General Topics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-12-2003, 03:36 PM
  2. Debian cd's: 3 or 8?
    By MikeT in forum Linux - General Topics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-06-2002, 10:20 PM
  3. Debian 3.0
    By jbstew32 in forum Linux - General Topics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-25-2002, 08:08 PM
  4. Would like to try Debian.....
    By chadm1967 in forum Linux - General Topics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-16-2001, 08:57 AM
  5. Debian and X
    By ASCI_Blue in forum Linux - General Topics
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 12-11-2001, 09:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •