Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Is Linux Really More Secure Than Windows?

  1. #1
    Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    1,672

    Is Linux Really More Secure Than Windows?

    Ramen, Slapper, Scalper and Mighty may sound like Santa's new team of reindeer, but they are creatures far lower down the evolutionary ladder -- and much less welcome. These are worms that have infiltrated Linux servers in recent months, commandeering the servers for use in distributed denial-of-service attacks. Linux enthusiasts who once believed they were less vulnerable to attack than Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) users have begun to wonder whether they were overly optimistic.

    But it is a mistake to think that one operating environment is inherently more risky than another, according to Eric Hemmendinger, research director at Aberdeen Group. The number of security flaws in software, he said, depends largely on the software's age.

    http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/19649.html

  2. #2

    Re:Is Linux Really More Secure Than Windows?

    With linux file permisions are not a second thought. You really need to be rooted to be harmed with linux. That alone should make linux more secure than most windows flavors. Even with win2k, most users out there are using it with no fire wall as administrator, or have given administrator rights to too many users. Only root has root privilage. Just my .02$


  3. #3
    Mentor coltrane's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,390

    Re:Is Linux Really More Secure Than Windows?

    I dont like this article, it seems to be misleading. You can compare software expliots to operating system exploits. Linux seperates the operating system and the application, while Windows integrates them.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Posts
    411

    Re:Is Linux Really More Secure Than Windows?

    Even Fort Knox is insecure if you leave the front door open. Linux lets you lock the doors and Winblows does too. It's just that Linux's locks are like those new electronic gizmos whereas Winders uses old, skeleton key style locks. Okay, bad analogy and not totally true.

    I'd say no OS is secure if you're careless and assume nobody out there wants to be mischeivous, malicious, or both.

Similar Threads

  1. IPtables, how secure is too secure?
    By beemer832 in forum Linux - Software, Applications & Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-12-2010, 07:14 PM
  2. Secure Remote Linux Administration
    By peter in forum Tutorials
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-24-2008, 05:22 AM
  3. Dual boot Windows and Linux using NTLDR (Windows Bootloader)
    By BeoR in forum Linux - General Topics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-18-2005, 10:02 AM
  4. Super-Secure Linux, Inch by Inch
    By stryder144 in forum General Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-14-2002, 03:36 AM
  5. NSA Secure Linux
    By jmbrinks in forum General Chat
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-29-2002, 12:36 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •