Reply With Quote
HEY! some of us have jobs that involve doze!you, sir, have problems.
You gave your better hardware to Windows? I can understand the need for Windows but you, sir, have problems.I had enough parts to build a machine that is almost exactly up to par with my Win box.
HEY! some of us have jobs that involve doze!you, sir, have problems.
Like I said, I can understand using both. But Windows belongs on the slower hardware, not the faster hardware.HEY! some of us have jobs that involve doze!
Nope. I don't agree. Windows needs faster/better hardware to function the way Linux on slower/cheaper hardware does.But Windows belongs on the slower hardware, not the faster hardware.
BUT I have AMD 700 with Red Hat 7.2 and Win2K on P233 with 128 MB.. If it won't run better than Linux, why need a faster/better hardware?? ;D
Who needs all this functionality from Windows anyway? We're Linux users. We're supposed to use Linux primarily. Windows is just for job or school-related crap. Well a few of us may just be beginning to use Linux and still rely on Windows a lot, but if you're a serious Linux user and have been using it for at least a month, Linux should be priority when it comes to hardware.Nope. I don't agree. Windows needs faster/better hardware to function the way Linux on slower/cheaper hardware does.
Depends on the person and their needs. I certain use my best hardware for Linux and run 'Doze on my old banger box, but a die-hard gamer or an AutoCAD user or some such would feel differently.
Who needs all this functionality from Windows anyway? We're Linux users. We're supposed to use Linux primarily. Windows is just for job or school-related crap. Well a few of us may just be beginning to use Linux and still rely on Windows a lot, but if you're a serious Linux user and have been using it for at least a month, Linux should be priority when it comes to hardware.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks