Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption

  1. #1
    Administrator Advisor peter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    882

    Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption

    Interesting article with this quote:

    It is the brave individual who will migrate their organization's desktops to Linux
    Not so much a technology failure as a people failure.

    http://searchopensource.techtarget.c...165420,00.html

    Maybe it would have been better to introduce OpenOffice on the MS desktop, then go to Linux after people got comfortable with it.

    I haven't had that much grief with Linux hardware compatibility, but then I like my OS installations to be simple. My biggest problem has been with wireless and NDISwrapper seems to work fine for that.

  2. #2
    Mentor jro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    1,206
    I read this article earlier. I think you are right, people probably would rebel should you replace everything they have gotten comfortable with all at once. But with many open source apps having Win32 counterparts, you can slowly migrate people as they get comfortable.

    But as you, and the article said, laptops and wireless can be a relentless issue.
    jro - http://jeff.robbins.ws
    Linux counter#:213782
    GnuPG ID: 406238E7

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Good Guru
    Compunuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,935
    This point had been advised in many and countess articles and books about migrating to opensource. The end user (the secretary type) could care less about what OS they are running on (even if they KNOW what OS their computers are running). All they care is their application. As long as the application they use remains the same, they don't care what is under the hood.

    The successful migrations should always start with desktop applications such as Office, browser, email programs and the likes. Once you can run those without any problems, then you switch the OS.

    I know it's not this easy to do (but what is?). That's why I support Sun's effort to keep StarOffice and OpenOffice separated. If you buy StarOffice, you can get MS compartible modules that will seemlessly integrate with MS Office file formats. If your ORG absolutely need this kind of compartibility, then you should opt for StarOffice (and pay some $$ for those excellent programmers).

    I use OpenOffice and MS Office both. I can easily open up XSL files but I will lose the formatting (which is no big deal for me).
    LinuxVillage - The truely community run Linux/Floss forum !

    No IT BS !!

Similar Threads

  1. Does Linux need Microsoft?
    By starfish in forum General Chat
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-19-2005, 03:38 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-06-2005, 05:24 AM
  3. Desktop Linux: The Final Hurdles
    By in forum General Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-11-2004, 12:47 AM
  4. Novell aims Linux at corporate desktops
    By in forum General Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-09-2004, 01:51 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-22-2003, 03:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •