Has anyone tried 9.2 yet? If you've tried Mandy 10.1, how would you compare the two?
Has anyone tried 9.2 yet? If you've tried Mandy 10.1, how would you compare the two?
[quote author=Coral Sea link=board=7;threadid=10135;start=#msg91776 date=1105403664]
Has anyone tried 9.2 yet? If you've tried Mandy 10.1, how would you compare the two?
[/quote]
Check out this article:
http://www.mandrake.tips.4.free.fr/reviewsuse92.html
Good article. I'm going to stick with Mandy 10.1 for now. Once you've experienced urpmi, it's hard to trade it in for YaST. The upside on SuSE would be KDE 3.3 (Mandy is still at KDE 3.2 unless you go with the Productivity Pack).
UPDATE:
I installed SuSE 9.2 AMD64 on one of my PCs. It's nice but, as the article points out, the preference for SuSE 9.2 or Mandy 10.1 depends more on which distro you're more familiar with than on any substantive difference between the two.
I just loaded SUSE 9.1 on this local Intel box and it's running sweet. :-*
Bookmarks