Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19

Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19

Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19

Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19

Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19

Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19

Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19

Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19

Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19

Warning: Function ereg() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 4

Warning: Function split() is deprecated in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 19
IRC channel - Page 5
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 53

Thread: IRC channel

  1. #41
    Mentor Stuart's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    nb.ca
    Posts
    1,087

    Re:IRC channel

    I asked in #oftc on OFTC and it turns out they don't support SSL (and ident doesn't seem to work - blah)..

    I tried asking on freenode but it's a real pain getting an answer.

  2. #42

    Re:IRC channel

    ok, explain to me again IN DETAIL why we should switch networks?

  3. #43
    Guest

    Re:IRC channel

    [quote author=Holy_Knight link=board=18;threadid=9302;start=30#msg84321 date=1086651801]
    ok, explain to me again IN DETAIL why we should switch networks?
    [/quote]

    I already explained my reasons for wanting to move to the FreeNode network.

  4. #44
    Guest

    Re:IRC channel

    [quote author=Holy_Knight link=board=18;threadid=9302;start=30#msg84321 date=1086651801]
    ok, explain to me again IN DETAIL why we should switch networks?
    [/quote]

    Code:
    Executive Summary:
    
    - Larger user base.
    - Stable network.
    - Active members oversee/moderate #ljr.
    I think that covers the biggest reasons.

  5. #45

    Re:IRC channel

    i have never had a single issue with oftc

    bigger userbase isn't always better

    we could easily change who has control if we stuck to oftc or lehnet

  6. #46

    Re:IRC channel

    Lets take a look at the size differences:

    FreeNode:
    [06:59] --- Current global users: 16092 Max: 18102

    OFTC:
    [06:58] --- Current global users: 1882 Max: 2096

    LEHNet:
    [07:01] --- Current Global Users: 31 Max: 47

    Yes, Freenode is huge and LEHNet is tiny. Now you know how huge/tiny.

    I still dont understand, though, how this can benifit us. It didn't benifit us back in the days before we moved to OFTC, and it doesn't seem like it would benifit us now. We might pick up a couple users, but for the most part, people never seem to explore random channels, especially on bigger networks when its harder to find them. The only way is if somebody says something about our channel, but that doesn't happen very often.

    Legion of Ethical Hackers is a good network, it has great staff beyond myself, and for the most part is fairly stable. We have had issues from time to time, but nothing that hasn't been fixed fairly quickly. On top of that the staff of the network will work closely with people from LinuxJunior, closer then either of the other networks can or will.

    Please, take careful consideration before voting, dont do it because Lovechild, Master Copy, or myself have said what we think, vote for what you think is best. Vote here:
    http://www.linuxjunior.org/yabbse/in...;threadid=9311

  7. #47

    Re:IRC channel

    I don't mean to be rude or mean, and it is not my intention to insult anyone.

    However, it seems to me that, no matter where we go, someone neutral should be the only ops (right away I don't want to be ops, cause i have no time for it.)

    I can easily see people being kicked off the channel just because they don't share the opinion of the ops...

  8. #48
    Guest

    Re:IRC channel

    [quote author=trickster link=board=18;threadid=9302;start=30#msg84367 date=1086704757]
    However, it seems to me that, no matter where we go, someone neutral should be the only ops (right away I don't want to be ops, cause i have no time for it.)

    I can easily see people being kicked off the channel just because they don't share the opinion of the ops...
    [/quote]

    having just one channel operator is bad idea because of the timezones... when ch-b and i owned the channel, we selected channel operators who were regularly in the channel for their timezone... since we are from europe, we made sure there was at least one american channel operator for the many hours that we weren't in the channel. i think it would be a good idea to do this for the new channel as well.

  9. #49

    Re:IRC channel

    [quote author=Ralinx link=board=18;threadid=9302;start=30#msg84380 date=1086708679]
    [quote author=trickster link=board=18;threadid=9302;start=30#msg84367 date=1086704757]
    However, it seems to me that, no matter where we go, someone neutral should be the only ops (right away I don't want to be ops, cause i have no time for it.)

    I can easily see people being kicked off the channel just because they don't share the opinion of the ops...
    [/quote]

    having just one channel operator is bad idea because of the timezones... when ch-b and i owned the channel, we selected channel operators who were regularly in the channel for their timezone... since we are from europe, we made sure there was at least one american channel operator for the many hours that we weren't in the channel. i think it would be a good idea to do this for the new channel as well.
    [/quote]
    That's fine.

  10. #50
    Moderator
    Good Guru
    Schotty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    5,760

    Re:IRC channel

    Well we can start with the moderators here, and then with the irc loiterers. I am sure that we can have ~4 people that can be available at the particular time in question.

Similar Threads

  1. OpenFree IRC Channel
    By mojo jojo in forum General Chat
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-02-2007, 08:09 AM
  2. Should we move the IRC Channel?
    By trickster in forum Announcements and Suggestions
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: 08-04-2004, 06:03 AM
  3. so what about the IRC Channel?
    By in forum Announcements and Suggestions
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 06-29-2004, 03:10 AM
  4. IRC channel
    By kavarogep in forum Announcements and Suggestions
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-25-2002, 11:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •